<em id="t3tdf"></em>

        <sup id="t3tdf"><menu id="t3tdf"></menu></sup>
            <div id="t3tdf"></div>

              <sup id="t3tdf"></sup>
              <em id="t3tdf"><tr id="t3tdf"><mark id="t3tdf"></mark></tr></em>
              <em id="t3tdf"></em><dl id="t3tdf"><meter id="t3tdf"></meter></dl>

                [1]王亮,李昱翰,任丽梅,等.W S模型与双水模型对泥质砂岩 附加导电性描述的对比分析[J].测井技术,2018,42(06):622-628.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.06.003]
                 WANG Liang,LI Yuhan,REN Limei,et al.Comparison of W S Model and Dual Water Model in Describing the Additional Conductivity of Argillaceous Sandstone[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2018,42(06):622-628.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.06.003]
                点击复制

                W S模型与双水模型对泥质砂岩 附加导电性描述的对比分析()
                分享到:

                《测井技术》[ISSN:1004-1338/CN:61-1223/TE]

                卷:
                第42卷
                期数:
                2018年06期
                页码:
                622-628
                栏目:
                实验研究
                出版日期:
                2018-12-31

                文章信息/Info

                Title:
                Comparison of W S Model and Dual Water Model in Describing the Additional Conductivity of Argillaceous Sandstone
                文章编号:
                1004-1338(2018)06-0622-07
                作者:
                王亮12李昱翰3任丽梅3宋林珂3苏静3
                1.西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川成都610500;2.中国石油大学 地球物理与信息工程学院,?#26412;?02249;3.西南油气田分公司川中油气矿,四川遂宁834000
                Author(s):
                WANG Liang12LI Yuhan3REN Limei3SONG Linke3SU Jing3
                1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China; 2. College of Geophysics and Information Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China; 3. Central Sichuan Mining District, Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, PetroChina, Suining, Sichuan 834000, China
                关键词:
                测井解释W S模型双水模型泥质砂岩饱和度胶结指数
                Keywords:
                log interpretation W S model dual water model argillaceous sandstone saturation cementation index
                分类号:
                P631.84
                DOI:
                10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.06.003
                文献标志码:
                A
                摘要:
                基于大量泥质砂岩岩心实验数据,探讨了Clavier与Waxman等关于W-S模型与双水模型描述泥质砂岩导电能力以及胶结指数是否受阳离子附加导电影响的争论。与双水模型相比,W S模型能更好描述泥质砂岩的导电规律;双水模型在低温、低地层水溶液矿化度以及高温、高地层水溶液矿化度时,描述泥质砂岩导电的能力相对较差;与双水模型中胶结指数(mo)相比,W-S模型中胶结指数(m*)不受岩石阳离子附加导电的影响,而是受控于岩石的孔隙结构。
                Abstract:
                Based on the study of a large number of argillaceous sandstone core data, this paper discusses the debate between Clavier and Waxman for the W S model and the dual-water model: whether the conductivity of the argillaceous sandstone and the cementation index are affected by the additional conductivity of the cation. The study found that compared with the dual-water model, the W S model can better describe the conductivity of argillaceous sandstones. In addition, under the conditions of low temperature and low formation water salinity or high-temperature and high-layer water salinity, the dual-water model cannot describe the conductivity of argillaceous sandstone very well; compared with the cementation index (mo) in the dual-water model, the cementation index (m*) in the W S model is not affected by the additional conductivity of the rock cation, but is controlled by the pore structure.

                参考文献/References:

                [1]WANG L, MAO Z Q, SHI Y J, et al. A novel model of predicting Archie’s cementation factor from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs in low permeability reservoirs [J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2014, 25(1): 183-188.
                [2]DACY J, MARTIN P. Practical advances in core-based water saturation analysis of shaly tight gas sands [J]. Petrophysics, 2008, 49(1): 17-27.
                [3]王亮. 低阻油层成因、岩石物理特征及测井评价技术研究: 以准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区头屯河组储层为例 [D]. ?#26412;? 中国石油大学, 2014.
                [4]DENG S, L W, LIU Q, et al. Research on oil displacement mechanism in conglomerate using CT scanning method [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3): 365-370.
                [5]欧阳健, 毛志强, 修立军, 等. 测井低对比度油层成因机理与评价方法 [M]. ?#26412;? 石油工业出版社, 2009.
                [6]张冲. 准噶尔盆地南缘复杂油气藏测井评价方法及技术研究 [D]. ?#26412;? 中国石油大学, 2011.
                [7]孙建孟, 王克文, 李伟. 测井饱和度解释模型发展及分析 [J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(1): 101-107.
                [8]WAXMAN M, SMITS L J M. Electrical conductivities in oil bearing shaly sand [J]. SPE Journal, 1968, 42(3): 107-122.
                [9]WAXMAN M H, THOMAS E C. Electrical conductivities in shaly sands: (I) the relation between hydrocarbon saturation and resistivity index;(II) the temperature coefficient of electrical conductivity [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1974, 26(3): 213-225.
                [10]WAXMAN M H, THOMAS E C. Technical note: an addendum to electrical conductivities in shaly sands—I. the relation between hydrocarbon saturation and resistivity index;II. the temperature coefficient of electrical conductivity [J]. SPE Journal, 2007, 12(3): 392.
                [11]CLAVIER C, COATES G, DUMANOIR J. Theory and experimental basis for the dual-water model for interpretation of shaly sands [C]∥SPE 6859, 1977.
                [12]MARTIN M, MURRAY G H, GILLINGHAM W J. Determination of the potential productivity of oil-bearing formations by resistivity measurements [J]. Geophysics, 1938, 3(3): 258-272.
                [13]HILL H J, WINSAUER J D. Effect of clay and water salinity on electrochemical behavior of reservoir rock [J]. Trans. AIME, 1956, 207(1): 65-72.
                [14]HILL H J, SHIRLEY O J, KLEIN G E, et al. Bound water in shaly sands: Its relation to QV and other formation properties [J]. The Log Analyst, 1979, 20(3): 3-19.
                [15]COATES G R, BOUTEMY Y, CLAVIER C. A study of the dual-water model based on log data [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 35(1): 158-166.

                相似文献/References:

                [1]赵军龙,李甘,李传浩,等.鄂尔多斯盆地Z区长81储层流体快速识别技术研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(05):485.
                 ZHAO Junlong,LI Gan,LI Chuanhao,et al.Research on the Fast Identification Technique about Fluid Property of Chang 81 Reservoirs at Z Block in Ordos Basin[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):485.
                [2]关丽.?#25216;?#23376;声波测井在罗家地区沙三段泥页岩储层评价中的应用[J].测井技术,2012,36(05):495.
                 GUAN Li.Application of Dipole Acoustic Logging to Shale Reservoir Evaluation of Luojia Area[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):495.
                [3]?#26434;栏?冉利民,吴非.螺纹井眼测井曲线频域滤波校正[J].测井技术,2012,36(05):499.
                 ZHAO Yonggang,RAN Limin,WU Fei.Frequency Domain Filtering Correction of Log Data from a Corkscrew Borehole[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):499.
                [4]李山生,黄质昌,杜蕊,等.WaxmanSmits模型中参数B和QV计算方法研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(03):244.
                 LI Shansheng,HUANG Zhichang,DU Rui,et al.Study on Computational Methods of Parameter B and QV in WaxmanSmits Model[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):244.
                [5]陈明江,任兴国.含沥青储层的测井识别及评价[J].测井技术,2012,36(03):272.
                 CHEN Mingjiang,REN Xingguo.Log Identification and Evaluation for Bitumenbearing Reservoir[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):272.
                [6]程玉梅,张小刚,魏国.介电扫描测井技术在长庆油田的应用[J].测井技术,2012,36(03):277.
                 CHENG Yumei,ZHANG Xiaogang,WEI Guo.Application of Dielectric Scanner Logging in Changqing Oilfield[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):277.
                [7]孙建孟,闫国亮.渗透率模型研究进展[J].测井技术,2012,36(04):329.
                 SUN Jianmeng,YAN Guoliang.Review on Absolute Permeability Model[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):329.
                [8]宋延杰,么丽娜,徐广田,等.长垣地区低孔隙度低渗透率砂岩储层中连通导电模型的应用[J].测井技术,2012,36(04):345.
                 SONG Yanjie,YAO Lina,XU Guangtian,et al.Study on Connectivity Model for Low Porosity and Permeability Sand Reservoirs in Daqing Placanticline[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):345.
                [9]张丽华,潘保芝,刘思慧,等.梨树断陷东南斜坡带砂砾岩岩性识别方法研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(04):370.
                 ZHANG Lihua,PAN Baozhi,LIU Sihui,et al.On Lithology Identification Methods of Glutinite in Southeast Ramp Region of Lishu Fault Depression[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):370.
                [10]张盼,冯吉坤,李雪磊,等.火山岩中CO2储层的自动识别[J].测井技术,2012,36(04):373.
                 ZHANG Pan,FENG Jikun,LI Xuelei,et al.Automatic Identification of CO2Bearing Beds in the Volcanic Reservoir[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(06):373.

                备注/Memo

                备注/Memo:
                基金项目:四川盆地大型碳酸盐岩气田开发示范工程(2016ZX05052);国家自然基金项目“页岩气储层微观孔隙结构连续定量表征与含气量评价”(41504108);国土资源部沉积盆地与油气资源重点实验室开放性基金项目“页岩气储层含气量评价”(Zdsys2015003);四川省教育厅自然科学类基金项目“页岩气储层微观孔隙结构实验表征及连续定量评价方法”(15ZB0057);中国博士后科学基金面上资助“多因素耦合作用下的致密油储层孔隙结构与含油性评价”(2015M 582568)联?#29486;?#21161; 第一作者:王亮,男,1986年生,副教授,从事油气测井方法、解释及地质应?#26757;?#38754;的科研与教学工作。E-mail:[email protected]
                更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-31
                588彩票网下载

                  <em id="t3tdf"></em>

                      <sup id="t3tdf"><menu id="t3tdf"></menu></sup>
                          <div id="t3tdf"></div>

                            <sup id="t3tdf"></sup>
                            <em id="t3tdf"><tr id="t3tdf"><mark id="t3tdf"></mark></tr></em>
                            <em id="t3tdf"></em><dl id="t3tdf"><meter id="t3tdf"></meter></dl>

                                <em id="t3tdf"></em>

                                    <sup id="t3tdf"><menu id="t3tdf"></menu></sup>
                                        <div id="t3tdf"></div>

                                          <sup id="t3tdf"></sup>
                                          <em id="t3tdf"><tr id="t3tdf"><mark id="t3tdf"></mark></tr></em>
                                          <em id="t3tdf"></em><dl id="t3tdf"><meter id="t3tdf"></meter></dl>
                                            江苏十一选五中奖技巧 金多宝中特论坛 湖南幸运赛车开奖助手 中国体彩网logo 篮球胜分差同时买 竞彩4串1怎么计算奖金 河北快3开奖结果 多乐彩的玩法 棋牌广告词吸引 吉林十一选五开奖结果 江苏十一选5遗漏号码 广东时时彩后庄177亿 福彩报纸的首页 七星彩软件哪个好 广东快乐10分开奖走势图带预测